target is new

an exploration in the new

Category: Uncategorized

Design for the new Industrial Age

For the Dutch Design Week of 2012 (20 – 28 October) I was invited to share my vision on the changing role of the designer in our post digital age we are entering fast. I did a long version on the convention floor twice and a shorter one at the conference.

 

In my long version I first sketched how our life is influenced by the digital context. We are used to the availability of digital content. We have the world of knowledge at our fingertips all the time with our smartphone, we choose media more and more on demand and we customise our physical products like we do with digital ones. The concept of code/space is inspiring in that. In a lot of situations the digital context is crucial for the functioning. No connection means no function. Think of an airport.

Products can not live without the services that are integrated. Apple is learning that hard lesson with their Map-gate where the poor quality of the map is defining the quality perception of the iPhone more than ever.

Digital as default. We see that the Internet is not only connecting services and people, but also things. With the new IPv6 standard we have enough addresses to connect all products to the Internet. Interesting new products emerge.
The interesting products are those that are designed from a valuable usage. Things with internet will be smarter and get new interaction principles, like the Nest thermostat. Learning from the behaviour and using contextual data from as well within the home with sensors as from outside with the connection to the latest weather reports.

Interesting are also products that are more mundane, or even ‘crappy’. Like the fridge magnet pizza button. A connected button that delivers you a pizza by pushing the button.
Simply adding connectivity can deliver a lot of value. Like with Asthmapolis where every puff of an asthma patient contributes to a map of dirty-air places.

Digital as default and ubiquitous virtuality has lead to a new romantic feeling for the real. Making the data tangible again is happening more and more. The makers movement is hot. We like printing your own old-fashioned newspaper or creating beautiful installations around our virtual presence.

3D printing fits this development. We see a rapid democratizing of 3D printing. Now as a gadget for the high brow at the Bijenkorf Dol Dwaze Dagen, next year just a couple of hunderds of euro for printing simple stuff. And very accessible service providers for more complex stuff. New types of products are emerging, with hard to make forms and with personalised scripted products, products that are designed but also leave a lot open for the end buyer to make its own.

With digital default we see that services become predictive using big data. Like Google Now, where the service knows more (or at least earlier) about you than you self do.
Products will be always the part of an ecosystem. A cloud system like Bergcloud introduces with their Little Printer. Not the printer is the product, but the Bergcloud you build in your home wil be the product you buy and use for all kind of connected output devices.

The ultimate personalised one fits just one product will happen more and more. Made possible by kits that we as designers will be making for users, like the Homesense Kit.

Products will be hackable by default. Remixing IKEA as example is now something for a niche group of users. It will be part of the service IKEA offers.
And products will adapt the use. Like the dashboard of the new Volvo V40 that fits your driving style.

And so we will see that new capabilities of designers are addressed. We cannot design for all, we need to design for remix, for adaption. Scripted products like the example made by Soundcloud and Shapeways – The Vibe – where a case is designed around the forms of waveforms. Waveforms the user can choose himself.

This does not mean that the role of the designer is played out. It changes. We will see especially places like Etsy emerge within big manufactures where the designers will be connected to the users, and manufacturing will be like Kickstarter, pitching the products ideas to the buyer before producing and starting a dialogue.

So the new designer should be prepared for the new Industrial Revolution as Chris Andersen puts it so right. The principles of the Long Tail will be part of all our products we buy and use.
As designer you should start changing your behaviour to make very personal products, both personal with a story as personalised by the buyer.
And the designer should design open products. Products that are hackable or are ready for personal extensions.
And products should be smart. The Big Data that is produced by the connected products is not meant for big infrastructures, but is used to create tiny services for just that one user.

 

PICNIC Innovation mashup

Last Tuesday I visited a new event organized by the PICNIC organization; the innovation mashup. In the morning four speakers shared their visions, of which those from Shell and IDEO stand out. In the afternoon there were different workshops organized to think on innovation. I attended the one of colleague agency Frog to experience their methods of creative collaborative thinking, which is comparable to the approach we have. Sitting together with people from different backgrounds thinking on a case was a good experience.

In stead of doing a full report I publish my Storified tweets. Marcel Kampman did a nice video report of the day too.

  1. iskandr
    Recipe. Create a business model and perform stress test on all elements per future scenarios. #picnic12
  2. iskandr
    @kevinrommen ik geloof dat het verschil niet zit in de creatieve oplossing, maar in de executie. Maar creativiteit is overal uiteraard.
  3. iskandr
    Corporate research is driven by speed vs failure. Failure is a gift. But be aware to own your own failure to learn. #picnic12 #shell
  4. iskandr
    ButterflyWorks: Everyone is an expert, make it count for commitment, play the orchestra for structure, analogies are your friends #picnic12
  5. iskandr
    Andrea Mallard of IDEO is super bored by talking on design thinking. The culture is more important to the success than the method #picnic12
  6. iskandr
    10 cultural quirks of IDEO. 1. Rituals vs rules. Rituals are more important, rules can enable the rituals. #picnic12
  7. iskandr
    Cuitural quirk 2. Play vs. work. Play is method to engage employees and quality of work. If it isnt fun it isnt working #ideo #picnic12
  8. iskandr
    Quirk 3. Personal vs. professional. Everybody cries at ideo. Because they care enough #picnic12
  9. iskandr
    Quirk 4. Failure vs. success. Fail talent show. Bad ideas has the chance to be great, good ideas are doomed to be good #picnic12
  10. iskandr
    Cultural quirk 5. Space vs. stuff. Space to enables the right kind of behaviour. In times of crises you don’t cut the m&m budget #picnic12
  11. iskandr
    Quirk 6. Prototyping vs. perfection. Invest nothing to be able to let go. Test ideas, not execution. #picnic12 #ideo
  12. iskandr
    Cultural quirk 8. Forgiveness vs. permission of initatives. 9. Purpose vs prize 10. Challengers vs. Followers #picnic12 #ideo
  13. iskandr
    Vodafone wants especially innovate on mhealth. DIY health. Because it happening, and the money flows there now #picnic12
  14. iskandr
    Complexity of the development of mhealth is the gap IT and health. A new challenge is organized by Vodafone. http://www.mobilesforgood.nl #picnic12

Connected video trends

Online video and connected TV were hot topics last week. I visited the Immovator CrossMediaCafe and the Online Tuesday, and FastMovingTargets invited also two players in this field. For me this field of connected TV and second screen apps are a longer interest, and I blogged before on this concept [herehere]. We will see a breakthrough this year and a possible definite change in the concept of watching video content if Apple is entering this market later this year. I wrote something on it also in my year forecast.

Four important elements defines the new online video experiences, close connected.

  • moving to a personal on demand consuming by default
  • the second screen as integrated part of realtime tv
  • crowd generated curation
  • authentic stories as binders

We have entered a time-shifted TV-viewing experience. We use the on demand services from our broadcasters more and more and watch our own selected TV-series. The next step is the personal relevant guides that will generated suggestions or even complete evening programs based on your data profile and social behavior. Tools like Peel will be common and build in our screens and work like Nest does, continuous becoming smarter. The payment model will change to a access based pay-per-use, where we can lower the costs by interacting with commercials.

Personal on demand behaviour we do on our own or with our family. But we still like to share our experiences with others. The on demand services will have an integrated social layer that connects others that are watching the same in the world or from your contacts, like the Into_Now app does, and it will even suggest to watch certain programs together with your peers at work so you have a topic for the next day. This can go as far as going watching together in a location like a cinema where you program you own evening.

This will be all part of your second screen mainly. We will have a second screen as integrated part of realtime tv (something we used to call live tv), but it will also be your tool to connect to others with time-shifted TV.

With the second screen it is important to understand the first and second screen are one. One experience, one story. At the same time the notion of first and second screen implies that one of them is dominant, and the other supportive. And that is the case indeed. A second screen that draws the attention away from the first screen is not a good experience. Our abilities to share attention will change by the way. For me there are a couple rules if you are designing this second screens.

First is that you should peel the story of the program down to its essence and build the different touchpoints on this story. The first screen will be the lead in the story, the second screen can play different roles. It can be a part of it to make it your personal story, or, and this is the most important function, it will generate a social emotional layer to the watching. In that sense the presentation of Kevin Slavin on this phenomenon is essential; we will have a kind of reference point for our own emotions with the emotions of the crowd that we experience via the second screen.
This can be passive like giving indications on the number of watchers and tweeters over the world (you see only filtered and relevant tweets complete) or it can be more active by creating a extra layer in the story as the Thuiscoach app is a nice example.

We will see a mayor development with the second screen apps this coming year, for instance as families are integrating their second screen apps together in one experience. And we will see integrated concepts between first and second screen apps from Apple, GoogleTV and Samsung.

On the content part there is a long winding trend tipping now; the use of amateur content in mainstream programs. Or better said; amateur content becoming broadcast content. With the on demand watching we will see that curating by peers is getting dominant. Apps like Showyou will get a place under a button on your remote control. And the channels made by people themselves will be part of TV evening.

The last aspect are the authenticity of the stories that becoming the brands of video content. This is important to create compelling multiple screen experiences, as well as it is the way to connect people in on demand viewing and more important, to let them generate profile data entries. Because just like all mayor trends generating, collecting and processing data will be the key in all concepts made for the new connected video.

The impact Steve made Apple make

I read a lot (too many) stories on the resignation of Steve Jobs last day. I find this one on O’Reilly Radar the best, really focusing on the impact and change he made Apple make.

In an era where entrepreneurialism is too often defined by incrementalism and pursuit of the exit strategy, Jobs’ Apple was always defined by true husbandry of a vision, and the long, often thankless, pursuit of excellence and customer delight that goes with it.

Ironically, though, Jobs’ greatest innovation may actually be as basic as “bringing humanity back into the center of the ring,” to borrow a phrase from Joe Strummer of the seminal rock band, The Clash.

Nuff said? Well, the article doesn’t go into the impact of the resignation itself. Is Jobs replaceable? He may have raised Apple to stand on its own feet, and he may also have built in the right insurance by staying in the board, but time will tell if this is enough to resist the urges from a market leader too control its positions in stead of keeping the view on the future product leaps.

I truely hope it will. But there are enough signals it is moving into a new phase. Not only based on the lawsuits for market protection and the patent wars, I think this was probably always a invisible part of the business. And also not only based on the fact that the new CEO Tim Cook has earned it credits in making the business more effective. But definitely by the next phase of lock-in strategies with the introduction of iCloud. How great the service seems to be, it could be well used to play the world domination card like we know it from Microsoft the last decades.

I’m a big lover and collector of the Apple products, and enthusiastic user of the service ecosystem. And I give it a fair chance that the DNA of the company is strong enough to inspire us with more disruptive human touched products. But it will be exciting times for sure…

Can we expect Google Groups?

This week a very interesting presentation by Paul Adams of Google was published on Slideshare called The Real Life Social Network. He nailed some trends in social media on real behavior. It was all over the blogosphere already. It reminds me of my presentation on virtual gated communities at Reboot 11 in 2008. One of the things I was thinking about back then was the way we would create groups with different levels of privacy. It will be very interesting if the presented visions of Adams are translated into a new social approach by Google, just like the rumor that was spread this week by former CTO of Google. Interesting to see how Google are trying to use another angle to confront facebook, with a differentiation in groups. Another thought I had is still valid: can we have interoperability in these groups between different providers?

Read the rest of this entry »

links for 2010-01-14

links for 2010-01-12

links for 2010-01-11

links for 2010-01-10

links for 2010-01-09

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.