Weeknotes 266 – precepts of our entangled artificial life

Hi y’all,

Happy Sinterklaas if you are celebrating this…

The week of a climate conference “in het hol van de leeuw” while the urgency is still not clear to all. (Perplexity: “in the lion’s den” describes a situation where someone is in a place or situation where they are in great danger or facing a formidable opponent).

Triggered thought

Listening to the Poki podcast last week, Wietse was referring to the concept of precepts and how these might be a kind of different form of mastering AI and GPTs. Or better, how the real co-performance or deep partnership with AI is played out when you can communicate on the level of precepts and not on the outcomes. I had to think about a presentation at This Happened back in the days by an architect working at a Dutch architectual agency ONL of Kas Oosterhuis that has been famous for integrating technology as part of the design material. The project presented was a design for a climbing hall, and the interesting part was that they managed to create a bespoke architecture for the walls by not designing the components as objects, but design the CNC machine that would produce the components. Which was already on a deeper level even than so-called “transformative algorithmic design”.

This is the returning theme I think that might pop-up almost every week. We are more and more conscious how nature is based on entanglement (read this book, or this); the next entanglement is potentially of the new forms of intelligence that emerge from our merge with the precepts…

Events to check

Notions from the news

Next to updates on AI you can do a weekly report on the latest on OpenAI (1, 2, 3, and also on Elon’s strange moves of the week. The latter is becoming more and more disassociated from reality. After moving to Mastodon and Blue Sky, Threads becomes another option for Europeans too.

Google is pushing back it’s next level AI, quietly, but ainvent new materials from history. Amazon in introducing a hallucinating Q.

AI assist

Dan Shipper is describing how to leverage ChatGPT to assist in decision-making by finding out what others have figured out before.

Edge computing was a thing, the thing even, before LLMs became dominant. Could make a comeback with personal AI-assistants.

Bespoke GPTs are taking off, but with consequences.

GenAI in the enterprise, longread and data-intense, scenario planning might be a useful tool

New assistants of the week: iA Writer helps to explore what is real, Personal Voice for disabled phone users, smart router, seamless translations.

And Stability ai is introducing realtime text-to-image generation. You still need some computing power, but realtime prompting is next level in human-machine interaction.

AI harms

The warning against harms are not always motivated by the right intentions, researchers found. The solutions are not helping either… On a different level, the carbon footprint of AI is explored in more detail. It is a catch 22 if you are projecting it as solution for climate change at COP28

“Super-advanced artificial intelligence (AI), left unchecked, has a “serious chance” of surpassing humans to become the next “apex species” of the planet, according to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.” And militarised AI is a higher risk than killer robots (is that not the same?)

What is real? Are memes human? Don’t trust your camera. Or pizza.

AI of A stupid? And how do we learn AI our values?

AI is eating the internet. And slowly chewing your career.

Robot intel

Teaching robots smart, co-learning

Sensing

A new product line of IKEA.

Sensing the weather, and vibes

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67541931

Sceptical futures? Or realistic?

Paper for the week

To keep in the theme of entanglement: Terms of entanglement: a posthumanist reading of Terms of Service

In this paper, we use ToS as an entrance point to explore design practices for democratic data governance. Drawing on posthuman perspectives, we make three posthuman design moves exploring entanglements, decentering, and co-performance in relation to Terms of Service. Through these explorations we begin to sketch a space for design to engage with democratic data governance through a practice of what we call revealing design that is aimed at meaningfully making visible these complex networked relations in actionable ways.

Seda Özçetin & Heather Wiltse (2023) Terms of entanglement: a posthumanist reading of Terms of Service, Human–Computer Interaction, DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2023.2281928

See y’all next week!

When I started the weeknotes some time a go, I also had the habit to update on my personal activities, as the weeknotes-format often does. The newsletter grew (deliberately) more into a newsletter than weeknotes, but I was thinking that a monthly overview might be nice to add here. So…

As you might know, I started in October as an independent futures researcher and beyond as a sort of extension from this newsletter. Check the about page for more details.

I have been asked to participate in writing a new agenda for the Dutch creative industries as a part of the KIA MV. And also exploring the forming of a coalition program on the impact of digitalising and precarious groups. I will share more if it is more public.

In the last months, I was very busy with organising ThingsCon, and rounding up the Cities of Things LAB010 project. In the new year, I will start looking into follow-up initiatives for Wijkbot, and also actively detail my future research services (find a rough outline here).

So please reach out if you like to have a coffee or call in early January!

Have a great week!


Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com