On day 3 the themes of wearables, mixing real and digital, AI and new interactions were present again.
I started the day with a panel on fashion technology. A good mix of panellists covered things as the characteristics of materials and the role of fashion with smart garments. Topics as storing data in the garment, making clothes that adapt to the outside temperature, and generating it’s own energy by your movement. The good thing was that also the manufacturing was covered and topics as stimulating hormones fabrics came by. New concepts as mushrooms that become a organic material that can grow into the right form. And of course 3D printing in clothes, were our Dutch designer Iris van Herpen was mentioned as haute couture inspiration.
One of the panellist -Billy Whitehouse- wore here navigation jacket that has navigation signals by haptic feedback. It is important to have others than fashion designer involved. Industrial designers have less fear for fashion rules.
New interfaces for the real-digital world were touched in a presentation on speech interaction. Some solid facts on how to design for speech dialogs. On ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition), NLU (Natural Language Understanding) and appropriate dialog response.
The talk did not make the specific connection to Internet of Things, but gave good design considerations for designing for speech
- understanding expectations
- leverage the strenghts of speech
- partner with other modalities (screens, gestures)
- frame the scope
- support what is natural
- provide conversational feedback
- identify ‘errors’ as opportunities
- consistency for a point of view. Cross device.
Overall: provide conversational feedback. Speech systems should follow our conversational norms. Indentify errors as opportunities.
Later I attended a session on the Myo, the new arm device that makes gesture control possible. Interesting device that he live demoed by using it as presenter remote for his Prezi. It is a smart device and he made clear how much tuning was necessary to get the musle reading right. I think it is most interesting when you have an open system you can calibrate yourself, and I think that is possible.
His trends: 1. Interfaces as next major advance computing, 2. next generation interface blur the lines humans & computers and 3. it will not be a cyborgs future.
The last talk I like to mention is the one of Molly Steenson. The room was quite empty. Apparently is the connection smart cities and architecture is not that hot. She had a solid story on the thin line between being smart and smart-ass in context of the city. With some good references to earlier history, especially the work of Cedric Price and his generator city project. Google seems to make this now for real at is new campus. See some of the slides in the Storify of the day.
The thin line is definitely important for more than the smart-city concept. The last presentation I saw (by accident) on future fashion shopping concepts how a techno focus can pass the line.